Strategy feature

Test what moves AI visibility

Run controlled experiments on your GEO strategy. Siftly splits your tracked topics into a test group and a control group, then tracks how visibility and citation metrics diverge over time. You see which changes actually move the needle.

Performance ComparisonActive
Visibility %
Pre-experiment baselineExperiment startToday
TestControl18 topics · 1,240 responses

Proof, not guesses

Turn GEO from guesswork into a measurable channel

Siftly splits your tracked topics into a balanced test group and control group, then tracks how visibility and citations diverge. You see which changes actually move the needle.

Divide topics into balanced groups

Siftly clusters your tracked topics by citation behavior and splits them into a test set and a control set. With balanced splits, a difference in outcome reflects your intervention, not uneven groups.

Watch the two groups diverge

Compare visibility % and citation counts for test vs control over time. A widening gap after you ship a content change is the signal that the change is working.

Compounding wins

Scale what works, skip what doesn't

Every experiment you run becomes reusable knowledge, win or loss. Roll the winners out to new topics and retire what didn’t move the metric.

A library of every change you’ve tested

Every experiment becomes part of your team’s playbook, winners and losers alike. Reuse winning patterns across pages; retire tactics that didn’t move the needle.

You call the winner, not a black box

Siftly surfaces the raw comparison: test vs control, visibility, citations, the trend. When the gap is clear, you mark the winning variant. No opaque verdicts from a model you can’t inspect.

Why it matters

Why experimentation is the missing piece

AI visibility experimentation is the practice of running controlled tests: split your tracked topics into a test group and a control group, change only the test group, and compare how visibility and citation metrics move between the two over time. Without a control, any change could be noise from a model update, a competitor launch, or plain topic volatility.

Monitoring shows where you stand, not what works

Most AI visibility tools stop at monitoring. They tell you where you rank, but not what to do about it. Experimentation adds the before/after structure that turns monitoring into a system for improvement.

A control group separates signal from noise

If your AI mention rate rises 10% after a change, that means nothing on its own. Maybe the whole category moved 10%. If your test group rises 10% and control stays flat, the change did the work.

How it works

How test & control splits work

From clustering to a called winner: Siftly builds balanced groups, holds the control steady, and measures the gap your change opens up.

01

Cluster your topics

Siftly analyzes citation patterns across your tracked topics and uses hierarchical clustering to group similar topics together based on which sources AI engines cite for each one.

02

Balance the split

Topics are divided into a test set and a control set so both groups have comparable baseline visibility, citation counts, and topic coverage. Split-quality scores tell you how well-matched the two groups are before you start.

03

Freeze the control

Leave the content supporting your control topics unchanged. Control is your “what would have happened” baseline. It captures background movement you didn’t cause.

04

Ship the change on test

Implement your intervention (new content, schema additions, restructuring, freshness updates) only for pages that answer test-group topics.

05

Track the divergence

Siftly records visibility % and citation counts for both groups daily and renders them side-by-side, so you can see the gap grow, or not.

06

Call the winner

When the trend between test and control is clear and holds over a multi-week window, mark the winning variant. The experiment stays in your library for reference and reuse.

Experiment types

Experiment types that drive results

Different interventions move AI visibility in different ways. They also take different amounts of time to show a clear signal.

Experiment TypeWhat You ChangeTypical ImpactTime to Clear Signal
Data enrichmentAdd original statistics, benchmarks, or survey resultsHigh: unique data is the strongest citation driver2-3 weeks
Structural optimizationReformat with GEO patterns (definitions, tables, ordered lists)Medium: improves AI parseability2-4 weeks
Schema additionAdd FAQ, HowTo, Speakable, or Article schemaMedium: explicit signals for AI crawlers3-4 weeks
Content expansionAdd new sections covering subtopics competitors missMedium-high: improves topical authority3-4 weeks
Freshness updateReplace outdated stats with current data, update dateMedium: AI prefers fresh content1-2 weeks (for real-time platforms)
New page creationPublish entirely new content targeting a visibility gapVariable: depends on topic competition4-6 weeks
PagesExport
PageCitationsIndexingAI SessionsCCRClicks
/fit-guide1832,4107.6%1,204
/blog/stability-vs-neutral1211,8426.6%918
/blog/marathon-shoe-picks961,3577.1%742
/blog/trail-under-150446127.2%287

Reading results

Reading experiment results

Every experiment surfaces the same core numbers side-by-side for test vs control. The signal isn’t a single verdict. It’s a widening, directional gap that holds across a multi-week window. When the two lines clearly diverge and the gap is stable, the change worked. One experiment per cluster at a time keeps the result attributable.

Visibility %

Share of responses mentioning your brand

Citations

URLs cited from your site

Δ vs Control

Raw gap between test and control

Trend

Direction and steepness over time

Getting started

Time to value, not time to configure

Go from a balanced split to a clear test-vs-control gap in weeks. Setup doesn’t take weeks.

Week 1

Set up the split

Pick the topics you're testing. Siftly clusters them into balanced test and control groups using citation-based similarity so the two groups start from comparable baselines.

Week 2

Ship the change

Implement your content change (new pages, schema, restructuring, freshness updates) on the pages that answer your test-group topics. Leave control-group topics untouched.

Week 3-4

Read the gap

Watch visibility and citation metrics for test vs control diverge. When the gap is clear and stable, mark the winning variant and roll the change out to other topics.

Questions

FAQ

You split your tracked topics into a test group and a control group. You leave the control group unchanged and ship a specific content change that affects only the test group. Siftly tracks visibility % and citation counts for both groups over time, showing you whether the change actually moved the needle relative to what would have happened anyway.
Most experiments need 2-4 weeks before the gap between test and control is clear enough to act on. The more sensitive the topics (frequent queries, fast-changing AI models), the sooner you'll see a trend. Siftly shows the daily and weekly trajectory so you can judge when the signal is strong and stable.
Common experiments include: adding original data or statistics to a page, restructuring content with GEO formatting (tables, definitions, ordered lists), adding or updating schema markup, rewriting page titles or meta descriptions, publishing new competitor comparison pages, and refreshing outdated statistics with current data.
In website A/B testing, you show different page versions to different users at the same time. In AI visibility experiments, you change content permanently for one set of topics (the test group) and leave other topics untouched (the control group). Then you compare how visibility and citation metrics move for the two groups over time.
Most AI visibility tools only monitor. They show you where you stand but not what works. Siftly adds a before/after structure: balanced test and control groups built from citation-based clustering, consistent daily measurement across both, and a historical library of every change you've tested and whether it moved the metric.

Keep exploring

Explore more features

AI Brand MonitoringSiftly is an AI brand monitoring platform that runs your customer prompts daily across 4 major AI engines. It flags every mention, position, sentiment, hallucination, and competitor co-occurrence in one dashboard.AI Prompt TrackingEvery buyer question is a prompt, and every prompt gets a different answer. Siftly tracks your prompt set across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, samples each one repeatedly, and shows whether your brand was named, which competitors were named beside you, and which sources the answer was built from.AI Crawler TrafficBefore an engine can cite you, its crawler has to fetch you. Siftly shows every AI crawler hit on your site as it happens: which bot, which page, whether the visit was for indexing or for training, and where it came from. It is the earliest signal you have that new content will be citable.The Siftly AgentMonitoring tells you where you are missing. The Siftly Agent does something about it: it researches the question, plans the piece, writes it against your brand facts, validates it, and hands you a draft ready to publish. You watch every phase and can steer or stop at any one.Reddit & LinkedInAI answers lean on community threads and professional posts far more than most brands expect. Siftly finds the Reddit conversations where your category is being decided, drafts replies that read like a person, and plans a LinkedIn cadence from the topics your own citation data says are worth owning.AI Citation TrackingSee which URLs get cited when AI platforms discuss your brand, competitors, and industry topics.ChatGPT VisibilitySiftly samples your target customer prompts across ChatGPT (GPT-4o, GPT-5, o1, ChatGPT Search) multiple times daily. It captures every mention, position, sentiment, cited source, and hallucination. Catch what single-shot checkers miss.Competitor BenchmarkingCompare how AI platforms position your brand vs. competitors: platform, topic, sentiment, and mention frequency.Share of VoiceQuantify what percentage of AI-generated recommendations include your brand, and how that share changes over time.GEO ContentCreate and optimize content structured for maximum visibility in AI-generated answers and recommendations.

Your buyers are asking AI.
Be the answer.